Please note: In 2003, the CTF updated its Grades of Recommendations to include an "I Recommendation" for situations where insufficient evidence exists to allow a recommendation to be made. (Formerly, these situations were captured under a "C Recommendation".) This change is not retroactive, and all "C Recommendations" made prior to 2003 have not been reevaluated in light of the new "I" recommendation grade. For a discussion of these recommendation grades, please link to the 2003 article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal here.
These recommendations were finalized by the Task Force in February 1999.
| MANEUVER | EFFECTIVENESS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE <REF> | RECOMMENDATION |
| Screening: | |||
| Infants at Normal Risk | |||
| Repeated serial clinical examination by trained examiners (Ortolani and Barlow tests in younger infants and surveillance for limitation in abduction, leg length discrepancy in older infants) |
Serial clinical examinations decrease
the operative rate from 1–2 per 1000 infants to 0.2–0.7 per 1000, with
a concomitant increase in the abduction splinting rate, to |
Level
III<19,23,25–27,29–35>
|
Fair evidence to include serial clinical examination of the hips by a trained clinician in the periodic health examination (PHE) of all infants until they are walking independently (grade B) |
| Rates of late DDH or operative intervention did not differ between infants undergoing ultrasound screening and those undergoing clinical examination | Level
II-16
|
||
| Ultrasound screening (static or dynamic method) | General ultrasound screening programs significantly increase the rates of intervention (splint therapy), repeat evaluations and false-positive diagnoses, without a decrease in the rates of late DDH or operative intervention | Level II-16 and level III8,9,13,15,22,24,38–45 | Fair evidence to exclude general ultrasound screening for DDH from the PHE of infants (grade D) |
| Infants at High Risk | |||
| Selective screening in high-risk infants (breech birth, clinical evidence of joint instability, family history of DDH) | Because most infants with DDH have no risk factors, selective screening is ineffective in reducing the operative rate | Level II-16 and level III32,41,67 | Fair evidence to exclude selective screening for DDH from the PHE of high-risk infants (grade D) |
| Radiographic examination of hips and pelvis in infants aged 3–5 mo | There is no consensus on the radiographic definition of DDH, and the clinical correlation to functional outcomes is lacking. Low sensitivity and poor interrater reliability have been reported | Level III<2,21,36> | Fair evidence to exclude routine radiographic screening for DDH from the PHE of high-risk infants (grade D) |
| Treatment: | |||
| Abduction therapy (Pavlik harness or other abduction devices) | The true effectiveness of abduction therapy is unknown. Studies have been confounded by the naturally high spontaneous resolution rate of DDH in infants | Insufficient evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of abduction therapy (grade C) | |
| Early splint therapy is not always effective. At least 20% of infants requiring operative intervention had splint therapy started shortly after birth | Level III<27,33,34,42,62> | ||
| Abduction splinting is associated with a variety of adverse events, including avascular necrosis of the hip (in 1%–4% of treated infants) | Level III<39,42,60,61> | ||
| Timing of abduction therapy (early intervention) | Given the high rate of spontaneous resolution of DDH, the optimal timing of early intervention is not immediately after birth | Level I<11> and level III<18,39> |
Good evidence to support a supervised period of observation for newborns with clinically detected DDH (grade A) Insufficient evidence to determine the optimal duration of observation (grade C) |