These recommendations were finalized by the Task Force in June 1992
| MANEUVER | EFFECTIVENESS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE <REF> | RECOMMENDATION |
| Human Papillomavirus (HPV) screening (added to Pap smear screening for cervical cancer*) using any of the following diagnostic tests: Visual inspection, Pap smear, Colposcopy/cervicography HPV group-specific antigen, DNA probe, Dot blot, Southern Blot or polymerase chain reaction. | HPV is associated with risk and grade of cervical cancer. | Cohort <3-6>and Case-control <8,11> studies (II-2) | Fair evidence to exclude from periodic health examination. (D) |
| The natural history of untreated HPV infection is poorly understood and there is no effective therapy that produces long-term success. | Randomized controlled trials <26-29,33> (I); cohort studies <27> (II-2) and case series <24> (III) for various therapies. | ||
| HPV diagnostic maneuvers have poor test characteristics or are invasive, costly or inadequately studied. Adverse effects of screening include: morbidity of testing and treatment, associated costs and labelling. Adding HPV screening to screening protocols for cervical cancer has not been studied. | Case Series <3,11,15,19-24> (III) |
* The Task Force recommends Pap smear screening (B Recommendation), see Chapter 73.
Link to Full Text of this review
Link to Structured Abstract of this review
Link to Selected References list of this review
Link to 1995 update: Screening for human papillomavirus infection in asymptomatic women
Reprinted in modified format by the Canadian
Task Force on Preventive Health Care
with permission.
Original Copyright
© 1994 Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
For any technical issues please contact: webmaster@ctfphc.org
Last modified March 27, 1998.