Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

Selected References

The Use of Home Uterine Activity Monitoring to Prevent Preterm Birth

Adapted by Geoffrey Anderson, MD, PhD, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, from the report  prepared for the US Preventive Services Task Force by Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH

These recommendations were finalized by the Task Force in June 1993

1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Home uterine activity monitoring for preterm labour: Review article. JAMA 1993; 270: 369-370

2. Moutquin JM, Pepiernik E: Can we lower the rate of preterm birth? Bull SOGC 1990; September: 19-20

3. Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee: Preterm labour Investigation and Management. Bull SOGC 1988; January/February: 13-15

4. Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr., Martin RW, et al: Prevention of preterm birth by ambulatory assessment of uterine activity: a randomized study. Am J Obstet Gyencol 1987; 156: 536-543

5. Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr, Martin RW, et al: A program of uterine activity monitoring and its effect on neonatal morbidity. J Perinatol 1988; 8: 228-231

6. Iams JD, Johnson FF, O'Shaughnessy RW, et al: A prospective random trial of home uterine activity monitoring in

pregnancies at increased risk of preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 638-643

7. Iams JD, Johnson FF, O'Shaughnessy RW, et al: A prospective random trial of home uterine activity monitoring in pregnancies at increased risk of preterm labour. Part II. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 595-603

8. Katz M: Home uterine activity monitoring [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 787-789

9. Newman RB: Randomized trial of home uterine activity monitoring [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1308-1309

10. Hill WC, Fleming AD, Martin RW, et al: Home uterine activity monitoring is associated with a reduction in preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 13S-18S

11. Dyson DC, Crites YM, Ray DA, et al: Prevention of preterm birth in high-risk patients: the role of education and provider contact versus home uterine monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 756-762

12. Mou SM, Sunderji SG, Gall S, et al: Multicenter randomized clinical trial of home uterine activity monitoring for detection of preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 858-866

13. Blondel B, Breart G, Berthoux Y, et al: Home uterine activity monitoring in France: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 424-429

14. Green CJ, Sheps SB, Friesen Kd, et al: Home uterine activity monitoring: A review of the scientific evidence. British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assignment (BCOHTA) 92: 1

15. Kosasa TS, Abou-Sayf FK, Li-Ma G, et al: Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of home monitoring of uterine contractions. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(1 suppl): 71S-75S

Link to Full Text of this review

Link to Structured Abstract of this review

Link to Summary Table of Recommendations of this review

Top of Page

Home PageCTFPHC Home Page

Reprinted in modified format by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
with permission.
Original Copyright © 1994 Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
For any technical issues please contact: webmaster@ctfphc.org
Last modified March 27, 1998.