These recommendations were finalized by the Task Force in March 1994
2. Bennett MJ, Little G, Dewhurst J, et al: Predictive value of ultrasound in early pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 338-341
3. Thacker SB: Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 437-444
4. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, et al: Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2: 585-588
5. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, et al: Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet 1990; 336: 387-391
6. Ewigman B, LeFevre M, Hesser J: A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 189-194
7. Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Aure JC, et al: Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial [letter]. Lancet 1984; 1: 1347
8. Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G, et al: Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 207-211
9. Neilson JP, Munjanja SP, Whitfield CR: Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1984; 289: 1179-1182
10. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et al: Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 821-827
11. Neilson JP: Routine ultrasound in early pregnancy. In: Pregnancy and Childbirth Module (eds. Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP), "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews": Review No. 03872, 9 June 1993. Published through "Cochrane Updates on Disk", Oxford: Update Software, 1994, Disk Issue 1
12. Neilson JP: Routine fetal anthropometry in late pregnancy. In: Pregnancy and Childbirth Module (eds. Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP), "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews": Review No. 03873, 24 March 1993. Published through "Cochrane Updates on Disk", Oxford: Update Software, 1994, Disk Issue 1
13. Bucher HC, Schmidt JG: Does routine ultrasound screening improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures. BMJ 1993; 307: 13-17
14. Report of the Federal Task Force on High Risk Pregnancies and Prenatal Records Systems, Dept of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, 1982: 25-26
15. Consensus Conference: The use of diagnostic ultrasound imaging during pregnancy. JAMA 1984; 252: 669-672
16. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Policy Statement: Guidelines for the performance of ultrasound examinations. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, No: 24, October 1993
17. Berwick DM, Weinstein MC: What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Med Care 1985; 23: 881-893
18. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 627-633
Link to Full Text of this review
Link to Structured Abstract of this review
Link to Summary Table of Recommendations of this review
Literature Search Update: Aug 3, 1998
Reprinted in modified format by the Canadian
Task Force on Preventive Health Care
with permission.
Original Copyright
© 1994 Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
For any technical issues please contact: webmaster@ctfphc.org
Last modified March 27, 1998.
