Please note: In 2003, the CTF updated its Grades of Recommendations to include an "I Recommendation" for situations where insufficient evidence exists to allow a recommendation to be made. (Formerly, these situations were captured under a "C Recommendation".) This change is not retroactive, and all "C Recommendations" made prior to 2003 have not been reevaluated in light of the new "I" recommendation grade. For a discussion of these recommendation grades, please link to the 2003 article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal here.
Epidemiological studies, for example those arising from Framingham,
Massachusetts have determined that the risks of death and morbid events
relate independently to both systolic and diastolic hypertension.
The risks of stroke and of cardiovascular diseases rise with age, given
the same levels of BP. Thus, the rate of morbid events is age-dependent,
for both men and women. In general, rates for men are higher than
for women of the same age with similar levels of BP. Moderate degrees
of hypertension are usually asymptomatic in all age groups.
Options
The only case-finding measure was the mercury sphygmomanometer. Treatment
focused on drug therapy using diuretics, beta-blockers, methyldopa and
reserpine.
Outcomes
Mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular/cardiac, cerebral vascular), morbid
cardiovascular events (including myocardial infarction, left ventricular
failure) and stroke (all, fatal).
Evidence
MEDLINE was searched to 1993 using the MeSH headings "hypertension",
"aged", "aged over 80" and publication type "clinical trial". Other data
sources were recent meta-analyses, review articles and input from experts.
Study results were synthesized in table or graphic format only.
Values
The 13-member Task Force of experts in family medicine, geriatric medicine,
pediatrics, psychiatry and epidemiology used an evidence-based method for
evaluating the effectiveness of preventive health care interventions. Recommendations
were not based on cost-effectiveness of options. Patient preferences were
not discussed.
Background papers providing critical appraisal of the evidence and tentative
recommendations prepared by the chapter author were pre-circulated to the
members. Evidence for this topic was presented and deliberated upon in
1- to 2-day meetings, 2 to 3 times per year from January 1993 to June 1993.
Consensus was reached on final recommendations.
Benefits, Harms, and Costs
4 RCTs confirm the benefits of drug therapy for older persons with
systolic blood pressure (BP) > 160 mmHg and diastolic BP >90 mmHg. Major
results are summarized below. To allow for comparisons, relative risks
have been converted to relative risk reductions1.
Converted results are indicated by { }.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly Trial |
|
p = 0.04 NNT52 = 23 |
p = 0.06 NNT5 = 37 (nonfatal cerebral vascular event) |
|
| Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program |
|
CI3 4% - 53% NNT5 = 90 (MIs) |
CI 18% - 51% p = 0.0003 NNT5 = 40 |
|
| Swedish Trial in Older Patients with Hypertension |
{CI 13% - 63%} |
{CI 14% - 67%} NNT5 = 14 |
||
| Medical Research Council trial |
CI 2% - 29% p=0.04 |
CI 3%- 42% p=0.04 |
Neither adverse effects nor costs of treatment were discussed.
Recommendations
Recommendation grade [A, B, C, D, E] and level of evidence
[I, II-1, II-2, II-3, III] are indicated after each recommendation. Citations
in support of individual recommendations are identified in the guideline
text.