Please note: In 2003, the CTF updated its Grades of Recommendations to include an "I Recommendation" for situations where insufficient evidence exists to allow a recommendation to be made. (Formerly, these situations were captured under a "C Recommendation".) This change is not retroactive, and all "C Recommendations" made prior to 2003 have not been reevaluated in light of the new "I" recommendation grade. For a discussion of these recommendation grades, please link to the 2003 article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal here.
Objective
To make recommendations for universal vaccination and screening for
vaccination in Canadian men and women to prevent the congenital rubella
syndrome.
Burden of Suffering
Rubella is generally a mild illness but when contracted by pregnant
women, especially in the first 16 weeks of pregnancy, it frequently causes
serious complications including miscarriage, abortion, stillbirth, and
congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). The most common manifestations
of CRS are hearing loss, developmental delay, growth retardation, and cardiac
and ocular defects. The lifetime cost of treating a patient with
CRS was estimated in 1985 to exceed 220,000 U.S. dollars.
Options
Congenital rubella syndrome can be prevented by 2 vaccination strategies.
One is to screen for the immunization status of all women of child-bearing
age and vaccinate those at risk. The second strategy is to immunize all
adolescents and young women. Screening can be done with serological
tests for antibodies or obtaining proof of vaccination history. Tests are
hemagglutination inhibition anitibody immunoassay (HI) and enzyme immunoassay
latex agglutination. Vaccination history can be verbal or taken from vaccination
cards, school records or medical charts.
Outcomes
Sensitivity and specificity of tests, rates of vaccination, adverse
effects of vaccination, adverse effects for the fetus and for infants whose
mothers had rubella during early pregnancy (miscarriage, abortion, and
stillbirth), congenital rubella syndrome (hearing loss, developmental delays,
growth retardation, and cardiac and occular deficits), rubella susceptibility
and infection and immune status.
Evidence
These recommendations were adapted from a report prepared for the 1989
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. MEDLINE was searched for 1989 - 1993
using the keywords rubella vaccine, adverse effects, and rubella. English
language studies were selected.
Values
The 13-member Task Force of experts in family medicine, geriatric medicine,
pediatrics, psychiatry and epidemiology used an evidence-based method for
evaluating the effectiveness of preventive health care interventions. Recommendations
were not based on cost-effectiveness of options. Patient preferences were
not discussed.
Background papers providing critical appraisal of the evidence and tentative recommendations prepared by the chapter author were pre-circulated to the members. Evidence for this topic was presented and deliberated upon in 1- to 2-day meetings from October 1993 to January 1994. Consensus was reached on final recommendations.
Benefits, Harms, and Costs
HI is labour-intensive and has a high rate of false positive and negative
results. Enzyme and latex agglutation tests have sensitivities of 92% to
100% and specificities of 71% to 100%, and are easier to perform and more
accurate than HI.
No population studies evaluated effectiveness of screening and rubella vaccination in reducing congenital rubella syndrome.
Vaccination is long lasting and efficacious. 6% to 12% of the young adult population is seronegative. A cohort study showed that after 6 to 7 years, 98.7% of girls who had been naturally immune were still immune compared with 95.1% of girls who had been susceptible and been vaccinated, and 42.8% who were susceptible and chose not to be vaccinated.
Vaccination of adolescents and children aged 14-18 months in Sweden & Finland reduced seronegativity and rubella infection in girls compared with untreated boys and men.
Rubella vaccine is contraindicated during pregnancy because of the theoretical possibility of teratogenicity.
There is no direct evidence that either screening or routine vaccination of males in military bases or colleges reduces CRS.
Adverse effects of live attenuated vaccine are mild and commonly include joint symptoms in adults.
Recommendations
Recommendation grade [A, B, C, D, E] and level of evidence
[I, II-1, II-2, II-3, III] are indicated after each recommendation. Citations
in support of individual recommendations are identified in the guideline
text.
Screening for Immunization Status Followed by Vaccination
Validation
This report was externally peer reviewed. The Canadian Immunization
Guide recommended universal vaccination for adolescent girls and women
of child-bearing age unless they have laboratory evidence of detectable
antibodies or documented evidence of vaccination. They also recommended
routine screening during pregnancy. The 1989 United States Preventive Services
Task Force recommended testing for rubella antibodies at the first clinical
encounter for all pregnant and nonpregnant women of child-bearing age who
do not have evidence of immunization. Susceptible nonpregnant women are
then vaccinated and pregnant women are vaccinated after delivery.
Sponsors
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health
Care developed this guideline with funding from Health Canada.
Source Document
Beaulieu M.D. Screening and vaccinating adolescents and adults to prevent
congenital rubella syndrome. In: Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health
Examination. Canadian
Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa: Health Canada,
1994; 126-33.